September 11, 2001
Four commercial aircraft were hijacked by terrorists, leading to nearly 3,000 deaths. The attacks exposed the need for stronger flight deck security, resulting in a mandate for hardened flight deck doors on passenger aircraft.
Flight deck barriers protect airliners from security threats, yet gaps remain—passenger aircraft need secondary barriers, and cargo aircraft lack intrusion-resistant doors entirely.
The 9/11 attacks exposed a major vulnerability in airline security: inadequate flight deck protection. In response, Congress mandated hardened flight deck doors on passenger aircraft to prevent unauthorized access. But these doors must still be opened during flight, creating a security risk. Meanwhile, a glaring security gap remains in all-cargo operations, where intrusion-resistant doors are not required at all.
Hardened flight deck doors improved security, but they are not a complete solution. A security device known as a "secondary barrier" is needed to prevent hostile individuals from reaching the flight deck any time the hard door is open during flight.
These lightweight, retractable security gates remain deployed when the flight deck door is opened in flight, ensuring continued protection for pilots, passengers, and crew.
After years of stalling, the FAA recently finalized a rule requiring secondary barriers on newly manufactured commercial airline passenger aircraft. But this regulation does not apply to existing aircraft, leaving many planes unprotected.
In May 2024 Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024. Section 350 of the legislation requires the FAA to:
Convene an aviation rulemaking committee (ARC) to review and develop findings and recommendations to require installation of a secondary cockpit barrier on commercial passenger aircraft operated under the provisions of Part 121 that are not captured under another regulation or proposed regulation.
Not later than 12 months after the convening of the ARC, the FAA shall submit to Congress a report based on the ARC's findings and recommendations.
Not later than 36 months after the date of the submission of the report to Congress, the FAA shall, taking into consideration the final reported findings and recommendations of the ARC, issue a final rule requiring installation of a secondary cockpit barrier on each commercial passenger aircraft operated under the provisions of Part 121.
Unlike passenger aircraft, cargo flights are not required to have intrusion-resistant flight deck doors, despite carrying crewmembers and non-flight personnel onboard. Without these protections, cargo flights remain vulnerable to security threats, including hijacking attempts and insider attacks.
Legislation is needed to close this security gap and mandate hardened flight deck doors on all-cargo aircraft. Congress must act to ensure cargo pilots, and their payload, receive the same level of protection as their passenger airline counterparts.
Flight deck barriers provide critical protection against unauthorized access, yet gaps in current regulations leave many aircraft vulnerable.
Hardened flight deck doors on passenger airliners were a major step forward after 9/11, but they aren’t enough. Without secondary barriers, flight deck security remains incomplete.
We are calling on the FAA to reject attempts to delay critical flight deck security measures and implement, without delay, the secondary barrier requirement for all commercial passenger airline aircraft as mandated by Congress in Section 350 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024.
Learn more about key issues and how you can support our mission.